Review of Model Defamation Provisions

Meeting of Attorneys-General, Stage 2 Review of the Model Defamation Provisions (MDPs)

Part A exposure draft amendments to the MDPs

Part A of the Stage 2 Review of the MDPs addresses the question of internet intermediary liability in defamation for the publication of third-party content. New South Wales leads the Part A work.

On 12 August 2022, the Meeting of Attorneys-General agreed to release for public consultation the draft Part A Model Defamation Amendment Provisions and an accompanying Background Paper. A Summary Paper is also available for ease of reference – it is a short extract of the Background Paper. 

The due date for submissions was Friday 9 September 2022. 

The public submissions are available to review here. 

Stage 2 Discussion Paper 

On 31 March 2021, Attorneys-General agreed to release a discussion paper for the Stage 2 Review.

The Review of Model Defamation Provisions – Stage 2 Discussion Paper was the first step in the second stage of the review of the MDPs. 

View an accessible text-version of the Discussion Paper images

Attorneys-General sought written submissions in response to the Stage 2 Discussion Paper.

All public submissions are available to review here

Stage 1 Review of the MDPs

The Model Defamation Amendment Provisions have commenced in New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory.

This followed the former Council of Attorneys-General (CAG) approving amendments to Australia's Model Defamation Provisions (MDPs) on 27 July 2020, marking the end of the Stage 1 Review of the MDPs.

On 31 March 2021, Attorneys-General agreed that New South Wales, South Australia, Victoria and all other jurisdictions that are able to do so will commence the Model Defamation Amendment Provisions 2020 on 1 July 2021, and remaining jurisdictions will commence those provisions as soon as possible thereafter.

The Model Defamation Amendment Provisions can be viewed on the Parliamentary Counsel Committee's website. Consolidated Model Defamation Provisions (as at 27 July 2020) including amendments in Model Defamation Amendment Provisions 2020 can be viewed here.

The amendments follow wide-ranging consultations with media companies, peak legal bodies, academics, digital platforms and lawyers who represent both plaintiffs and defendants. The CAG's Defamation Working Party considered more than 70 submissions (see below).

The amendments have reset defamation law by improving the balance between protecting individual reputations and freedom of expression, particularly in matters of public interest.

Key changes include:

  • Clarification of the operation of the cap on non-economic damages;
  • Introduction of a new public interest defence modelled on section 4 of the UK Defamation Act 2013;
  • Introduction of a serious harm threshold for defamation claims, to be determined by the judicial officer as soon as practicable before the trial;
  • Introduction of a single publication rule which will enable the limitation period to run from the first publication of alleged defamatory material;
  • A requirement that concerns notices must be served with sufficient time for a offer to make amends to be made before proceedings can be commenced;
  • Introduction of a new defence for peer reviewed matters published in academic or scientific journals.
CAG also agreed to progress a second stage reform process focusing on the responsibilities and liability of digital platforms for defamatory content published online, as well as other issues Attorneys-General ask the DWP to consider.

Background to the Model Defamation Provisions reforms

The Model Defamation Provisions were endorsed in 2005 and each state and territory enacted legislation to implement the provisions. While responsibility for defamation law falls to individual states and territories, a national approach to reform is essential.

Led by the NSW Department of Communities and Justice, the Defamation Working Party invited feedback on draft amendments to the Model Defamation Provisions [PDF, 234kb]. An unofficial consolidation [PDF, 441kb] was also prepared to assist review, which tracks the draft amendments to the existing Model Defamation Provisions.

The accompanying Background Paper [PDF, 455kb] explained the policy rationale for the proposed amendments and confirmed the position of the Council of Attorneys-General on each question raised in the Discussion Paper which was released in February 2019 [PDF, 700kb].

Submissions to the Model Defamation Amendment Provisions 

Read the submissions to the Model Defamation Amendment Provisions

Submissions to the Stage 1 Discussion Paper

Read the submissions to the Stage 1 Discussion Paper

Supplementary submissions

Read the supplementary submissions